VERRETTE v. CHICAGO & N. W. RY.

No. 143.

40 Wis.2d 20 (1968)

161 N.W.2d 264

VERRETTE and another, Appellants, v. CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 1, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Walther & Burns and David L. Walther, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by David L. Walther.

For the respondent there was a brief by Wickham, Borgelt, Skogstad & Powell and Phillip E. Crump, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Crump.


BEILFUSS, J.

Two issues are presented:

(1) Is a railroad grade crossing a place of employment within the terms of the safe-place statute?

(2) Did the trial court err in granting defendant's motion for a directed verdict?

The plaintiff in his complaint alleges the railroad crossing was owned and used as a place of employment by the defendant and the plaintiff was a frequenter, and that the defendant failed to furnish and use safety devices and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases