NEIDER v. SPOEHR

No. 247.

39 Wis.2d 552 (1968)

159 N.W.2d 587

NEIDER, Appellant, v. SPOEHR and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 28, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Lee, Lee & Johnson, attorneys, and Melli, Smith, Shiels & McCrory of counsel, all of Madison, and oral argument by Robert W. Smith.

For the respondents there was a brief by William L. McCusker of Madison, for Clarence Spoehr and Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company, and by Hart, Kraege, Wightman, Bieber & Thurow of Madison, for William Neider and Northwestern National Insurance Company, and oral argument by Mr. McCusker.


BEILFUSS, J.

The issues are as follows:

1. Was the evidence insufficient to support an award for future loss of earning capacity?

2. Was the jury award of $20,000 for future pain, suffering and disability excessive?

3. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in setting the amount of the award pursuant to the Powers rule1 at $15,000?

In Reinke v. Woltjen (1966), 32 Wis.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases