1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 52 N.J.
  5. 52 N.J. 441 (1968)
 

KOSLOW, ET AL. v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF TP. OF WAYNE

52 N.J. 441 (1968)

245 A.2d 729

NATHAN KOSLOW, SARAH KOSLOW, ELAINE K. CANTER AND RITA K. NADLER, TRADING AS NATS ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WAYNE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 31, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Howard Stern argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Shavick, Thevos, Stern, Schotz and Steiger, attorneys).

Mr. Peter J. Van Norde argued the cause for defendant-respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by HALL, J.

This is a soil removal case, with broad planning, zoning and subdivision regulation connotations. It has had a tortuous history. In the current aspect, the defendant municipal governing body denied plaintiffs a permit to remove a large quantity of soil under the ordinance dealing with that subject. The Law Division, in this action in lieu of prerogative writ brought to review the municipal determination, disagreed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases