1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 278 F.Supp.
  5. 278 F.Supp. 211 (1968)
 

DIERINGER v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC R. CO.

No. 63-C-91.

278 F.Supp. 211 (1968)

John E. DIERINGER, Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. Wisconsin.

January 15, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William S. Porter, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff.

Rodger S. Trump, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant.

OPINION

REYNOLDS, Judge:

I. Issues

Before this court are the two issues remaining in this case that could not be resolved by agreement. They are:

1. Whether the plaintiff, a railroad employee, should receive interest on the back pay he has been awarded (and, if so, how that interest should be computed); and

2. What is the "reasonable attorney's fee" that under 45 U.S.C. § 153, First (p), must be "taxed and collected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases