1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 283 F.Supp.
  5. 283 F.Supp. 100 (1968)
 

GENERAL FOODS CORP. v. PERK FOODS COMPANY

No. 64 C 1829.

283 F.Supp. 100 (1968)

GENERAL FOODS CORP., Plaintiff, v. PERK FOODS COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D.

February 13, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Connolly, Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, Del., Phillip Bowman, Miller, Gorham Wescott & Adams, Chicago, Ill., Michael J. Quillinan, White Plains, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Herman Gordon and Ernest Cheslow, Dressler, Goldsmith, Clement & Gordon, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MAROVITZ, District Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. This action is for infringement of U. S. Letters Patent No. 3,119,691, which is entitled, "Novel Farinaceous Animal Food." It is resisted by a counterclaim alleging non-infringement and invalidity. The patent was issued to plaintiff, General Foods Corporation (hereinafter known as General Foods) on January 28, 1964, identifying Varnum...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases