1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 38 Wis.2d
  5. 38 Wis.2d 332 (1968)
 

EDWARDS v. STATE

38 Wis.2d 332 (1968)

EDWARDS, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 27, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by David J. Hase, attorney, and Grootemaat, Cook & Franke of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Hase.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by E. Michael McCann, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

WILKIE, J.

Officers' Activity at Residence and Validity of Arrest.

In urging his principal contention on this writ of error, defendant's arguments may be aptly characterized as seeking a rehearing of Jackson. In Jackson we concluded:

"Upon these facts we determine that there was no violation of defendant's constitutional rights in either the observations made by the two officers preceding the arrest for illegal use of heroin or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases