1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 16 Ohio
  5. 16 Ohio St. 2d 10 (1968)
 

CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. LEROUX

D. D. Nos. 90, 91 and 92.

16 Ohio St. 2d 10 (1968)

CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. LEROUX. CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. WEBER. DAYTON BAR ASSN. v. BOSTICK.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 20, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Peter Outcalt and Mr. James L. Elder, for relator in case D. D. No. 90.

Mr. Thomas A. Luken, for respondent in case D. D. No. 90.

Mr. Lawrence A. Kane, Jr., and Mr. Arnold Morelli, for relator in case D. D. No. 91.

Mr. Thomas A. Luken, for respondent in case D. D. No. 91.

Mr. Robert J. Eilerman and Mr. Harry P. Jeffrey, for relator in case D. D. No. 92.

Mr. Lloyd H. O'Hara and Mr. James T. Lynn, Jr., for respondent in case D. D. No. 92.

Per Curiam.

In each of these three cases the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline considered whether the failure to file income tax returns were crimes involving moral turpitude, and in each case the board decided that they were not.

The failure to file income tax returns is a misdemeanor, Section 7203, Title 26, U. S. Code. While such classification does not control the determination of whether moral turpitude is involved, it does indicate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases