1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 103 N.J.
  5. 103 N.J. Super. 109 (1968)
 

IN RE APPEAL OF THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE

103 N.J. Super. 109 (1968)

246 A.2d 722

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE FROM THE ASSESSMENT OF PROPERTY IN THE TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, COUNTY OF ESSEX, FOR THE YEAR 1961. CITY OF EAST ORANGE, RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON, APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 25, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold Friedman argued the cause for appellant Township of Livingston (Messrs. Clapp & Eisenberg, attorneys).

Mr. Jack Okin argued the cause for respondent City of East Orange.

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LABRECQUE, J.A.D.

The Township of Livingston appeals from a judgment of the Division of Tax Appeals (Division) reducing the aggregate assessment levied upon lands owned by the City of East Orange comprising the portion of the East Orange Water Reserve located in Livingston.

The lands in question are fully described in In re Appeal of East Orange, 80 N.J.Super. 219 (...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases