1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 52 N.J.
  5. 52 N.J. 134 (1968)
 

N. JERSEY DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY COMM. v. NEWARK, ET AL.

52 N.J. 134 (1968)

244 A.2d 113

NORTH JERSEY DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION, A PUBLIC AGENCY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 28, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Sam Weiss and Ferdinand J. Biunno argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Philip E. Gordon, Corporation Counsel, attorney).

Mr. Oscar R. Wilensky argued the cause for respondent North Jersey District Water Supply Commission; Mr. Robert L. Solan, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents The State of New Jersey and the Department of Conservation and Economic Development (Messrs. William Gural and Robert L. Solan, Deputy Attorneys General, of counsel; Hon. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Mountain in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, 103 N.J.Super. 542 (Ch. Div. 1968).

The complaint filed herein sought a declaration that the two water supply contracts entered into between the Commission, the City of Newark and a number of other municipalities were valid and enforceable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases