HUNT v. FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO.

No. 41618.

448 P.2d 1018 (1968)

Charles HUNT, Plaintiff in Error, v. The FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO., General Motors Corporation (Pontiac Motors Division) and Bee Line Motors Company, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

December 23, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James S. Steph, Rainey & Barksdale, Okmulgee, for plaintiff in error.

Lytle, Soule & Emery by John C. Harrington, Jr., Oklahoma City, for defendant in error, The Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Covington & Gibbon, Richard D. Gibbon, John S. Morgan, Tulsa, for defendant in error, Bee Line Motors Co.

Rhodes, Hieronymus, Holloway & Wilson, Bert M. Jones, Tulsa, for defendant in error, General Motors Corp. (Pontiac Motor Div.)


DAVISON, Justice.

Charles Hunt (plaintiff below) appeals from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict in favor of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., (defendants below) in an action to recover for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when an alleged defective tire manufactured by Firestone and placed on a new Pontiac automobile by General Motors Corporation, blew out and caused the automobile plaintiff was driving to run off...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases