1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 290 F.Supp.
  5. 290 F.Supp. 934 (1968)
 

BRITT v. CYRIL BATH COMPANY

Civ. A. No. C 67-717.

290 F.Supp. 934 (1968)

Raymond E. BRITT, Plaintiff, v. The CYRIL BATH COMPANY et al., Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

On Motion for Reconsideration September 16, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Myron N. Krotinger, Charles W. Phillips, John E. Purdy, and Alan Arnold of Lane, Krotinger, Santora & Stone, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Thomas V. Koykka and Walter A. Bates, of Arter, Hadden, Wykoff & Van Duzer, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

KALBFLEISCH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff's amended complaint purports to set forth two causes of action. The first alleges violation by defendants of Title 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j and Rule 10b-5 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The jurisdiction of this Court is claimed to exist by virtue of Title 15 U.S.C.A. § 78aa. The second cause of action is based on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases