1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 280 F.Supp.
  5. 280 F.Supp. 886 (1968)
 

CONSOLIDATED INTERNATIONAL EQ. & SUP. CO. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 3290; Protest Nos. 59/33146-9444-59.

280 F.Supp. 886 (1968)

CONSOLIDATED INTERNATIONAL EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY CO. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

February 15, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, New York City, (Allan H. Kamnitz and David Serko, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., (Harold L. Grossman and Alfred A. Taylor, Jr., New York City, trial attorneys), for defendant.

Before RAO and FORD, Judges.

FORD, Judge:

The protests at bar, consolidated for trial, involve merchandise known as Klischograph engraving machines and equipment therefor which was classified by the collector of customs as machine tools under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802, and assessed with duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff claims the merchandise is properly classifiable as printing machinery, or parts thereof, under the said paragraph...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases