1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 289 F.Supp.
  5. 289 F.Supp. 835 (1968)
 

DAVIS v. MORRISON-KNUDSEN CO.

Civ. No. 67-234.

289 F.Supp. 835 (1968)

Homer C. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MORRISON-KNUDSEN CO., Inc., a Delaware corporation and Perini Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, joint venturers, Defendants.

United States District Court D. Oregon.

July 30, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard P. Kelly, Kelly, Grant & Cooney, Medford, Or., for plaintiff.

Stanley E. Sharp, Tooze, Powers, Kerr, Tooze & Peterson, Portland, Or., for defendants.

OPINION

KILKENNY, District Judge:

Defendants' motion for a summary judgment is grounded on the theory that plaintiff's remedy, if any, is under the Workmen's Compensation Act of the state of Idaho and that this remedy is exclusive. The governing principle, as I view it, is whether Oregon or Idaho law should be applied. Plaintiff is a citizen of Oregon. Defendants are nonresidents of this state, but do business herein.

Defendants hired plaintiff in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases