1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 284 F.Supp.
  5. 284 F.Supp. 782 (1968)
 

ENESCO IMPORTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 3423; Protest 64/1302-14109.

284 F.Supp. 782 (1968)

ENESCO IMPORTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court, Third Division.

April 23, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schwartz & Lidstrom, Chicago, Ill. (Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, New York City, Earl R. Lidstrom, Chicago, Ill., and Joseph Schwartz of counsel), for plaintiff.

Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. (Glenn E. Harris and Thomas Fernandes, New York City, trial attorneys), for defendant.

Before RICHARDSON and LANDIS, Judges.

LANDIS, Judge:

Plaintiff importer has filed protest against the classification of certain teapots, identified on the invoice by numbers E-0197 and E-0198, which were assessed with duty at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem, plus 10 cents per dozen pieces, under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 53865, supplemented by T.D. 53877.

Plaintiff claims the articles should have been assessed at the rate of 6¼ per centum ad valorem...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases