1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 274 F.Supp.
  5. 274 F.Supp. 573 (1967)
 

UNITED STATES v. REED ROLLER BIT COMPANY

Civ. No. 66-248.

274 F.Supp. 573 (1967)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. REED ROLLER BIT COMPANY, American Machine & Foundry Company, and AMF American Iron, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court W. D. Oklahoma.

June 23, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond P. Hernacki, John T. Cusack, Paul D. Carrier, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

James E. Work, of Shirk, Withington, Work & Robinson, Oklahoma City, Okl., Herbert A. Bergson and Samuel H. Seymour, of Bergson & Borkland, Washington, D. C., for defendant American Machine & Foundry Co.

Coleman Hayes, of Monnet, Hayes, Bullis, Grubb & Thompson, Oklahoma City, Okl., John C. Snodgrass and John L. Murchison, Jr. of Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Searls, and C. M. Kucera, Houston, Tex., for defendant Reed Roller Bit Co.

OPINION or MEMORANDUM of DECISION

EUBANKS, District Judge.

On June 21, 1966, the United States instituted this action pursuant to section 15 of the Act of Congress of October 15, 1914 (38 Stat. 736; 15 U.S.C. § 25), as amended, commonly known as the Clayton Act, against Reed Roller Bit Company, American Machine & Foundry Company, and AMF American Iron, Inc., and alleged that the acquisition of AMF American...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases