1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 387 U.S.
  5. 387 U.S. 427 (1967)
 

SCHACKMAN v. ARNEBERGH

No. 1186.

387 U.S. 427 (1967)

87 S.Ct. 1622

18 L.Ed.2d 865

SCHACKMAN ET AL. v. ARNEBERGH, CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 29, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burton Marks for appellants.

Roger Arnebergh, pro se, Bourke Jones and Robert B. Burns for appellees Arnebergh et al.; Harold W. Kennedy, George Wakefield and Martin E. Weekes for appellees Younger et al.; and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, pro se, and A. Barry Cappello, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee Lynch.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek review by this Court of the refusal by the District Court to convene a three-judge District Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §§ 2281-2284. We have held that such review is available in the Court of Appeals, Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, and not in this Court. Buchanan v. Rhodes, 385 U.S. 3.

The motion to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases