1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 264 F.Supp.
  5. 264 F.Supp. 542 (1967)
 

SPEE-FLO MANUFACTURING CORP. v. BINKS MFG. CO.

Civ. A. No. 64-H-95.

264 F.Supp. 542 (1967)

The SPEE-FLO MANUFACTURING CORPORATION v. BINKS MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

United States District Court D. Texas, Houston Division.

February 21, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. F. McNenny, McNenny, Farrington, Pearne & Gordon, Cleveland, Ohio, and Edward C. Hutcheson, Hutcheson, Taliaferro & Hutcheson, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff.

Thomas R. Juettner, Gary, Parker, Juettner & Cullinan, Chicago, Ill., and Tom Arnold, Arnold & Roylance, Houston, Tex., for defendant.

OPINION

SINGLETON, District Judge.

The above entitled and numbered cause, having been tried before the Court without a jury, at the close of the evidence and after hearing arguments of counsel, this Court adopts the following opinion as its findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Plaintiff, Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation (Spee-Flo), a Texas corporation, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of spray painting equipment and has its principal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases