SEABOARD AIRLINE RAILROAD et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants, and
Southern Railway Company et al., Defendant-Intervenors.
United States District Court E. D. Virginia.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 3, 1967.
April 3, 1967.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Donal L. Turkal, Richmond, Va. (C. E. Martin, Atlanta, Ga., John F. Smith, Louisville, Ky., A. K. McIntyre, Erwin, Tenn., Phil C. Beverly, Jacksonville, Fla., on brief), for plaintiffs.
Raymond M. Zimmet, Atty., Interstate Commerce Com'n (Robert W. Ginnane, Gen. Counsel, Interstate Commerce Com'n, Donald F. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Claude V. Spratley, Jr., U. S. Atty., John H. D. Wigger, Atty., Dept. of Justice, on brief), for defendants.
John W. Douglas, Washington, D. C. (Hugh B. Cox, William H. Allen, Earl E. Eisenhart, Jr., Washington, D. C., H. Merrill Pasco, Richmond, Va., Verner, Liipfert & Bernhard and Covington & Burling, Washington, D. C., on brief), for defendant-intervenors, Southern Ry. Co. and others.
Edward B. Hipp, Gen. Counsel, Raleigh, N. C., for defendant-intervenor, North Carolina Public Utilities Commission. George A. Goodwyn, Asst. Atty. Gen. (T. Wade Burton, Atty. Gen. of North Carolina, on brief), for defendant-intervenors, North Carolina State Highway Commission and others.
Harry M. Lightsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant-intervenors, Public Service Commission of South Carolina and others.
Before BRYAN, Circuit Judge, and LEWIS and BUTZNER, District Judges.
United States District Court E. D. Virginia.
ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
The pith of this controversy is the accusation by the plaintiff railroads1 "that the local point-to-point carload commodity rates maintained by defendant-intervenors [Southern Railway System2] on sand, gravel, and crushed stone, at times hereinafter called aggregates, in those * * * [Southern] regions, are unjust and unreasonable...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
