1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 247 Md.
  5. 247 Md. 501 (1967)
 

PANITZ v. COMPTROLLER OF TREASURY AND STATE TREASURER

[No. 125, September Term, 1967 (Adv.).]

247 Md. 501 (1967)

232 A.2d 891

PANITZ, ET AL. v. COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY AND STATE TREASURER

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Opinion filed September 13, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. Liebmann and Lawrence F. Rodowsky, with whom was Shale D. Stiller on the brief, for appellants.

Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, Jon F. Oster, Assistant Attorney General, and Thomas A. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, with whom was Edward L. Blanton, Jr., Assistant Attorney General on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and HORNEY, MARBURY, OPPENHEIMER, BARNES, McWILLIAMS and FINAN, JJ.

HAMMOND, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This Court by per curiam order held on June 14, 1967, that Ch. 142 of the Laws of 1967, sometimes referred to as the Agnew-Hughes-Lee bill (or the amended Cooper-Hughes bill) was invalid and ineffective as a Supplementary Appropriation Bill but was prima facie valid as other legislation. The grounds for holding Ch. 142 to be invalid and ineffective as an appropriation bill were stated in the order to be that the enactment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases