1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 50 N.J.
  5. 50 N.J. 588 (1967)
 

MOGOLEFSKY ET AL. v. SCHOEM, ET AL.

50 N.J. 588 (1967)

236 A.2d 874

HAROLD MOGOLEFSKY AND MARTIN A. BERMAN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. IRA SCHOEM, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF CLIFTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. MARTIN A. BERMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. IRA SCHOEM, MAYOR, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 22, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sam Monchak for defendants-appellants.

Mr. Clive S. Cummis for plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Schiff, Cummis & Kent, attorneys; Mr. Cummis, of counsel; Mr. Michael B. Tischman and Mr. Steven S. Radin, on the brief).

Mr. Richard Newman, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of New Jersey and New Jersey Real Estate Commission, amici curiae (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HALL, J.

The plaintiffs are real estate salesmen duly licensed by the New Jersey Real Estate Commission. They are employed by J.I. Kislak, Inc., a real estate broker similarly licensed, which engages in brokerage of residential and other property in various parts of the state. One of its methods of securing residential property to sell is to have its salesman go from house to house...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases