1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 48 N.J.
  5. 48 N.J. 562 (1967)
 

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. v. WOJTYCHA

48 N.J. 562 (1967)

226 A.2d 837

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, WORTHINGTON CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND LIGNUM-VITAE PRODUCTS CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ALICE CHIRICHELLA, JOSEPH SENEC, REV. DOMINICK J. DEL MONTE AND GLORIA BRUNO, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CHESTER J. WOJTYCHA, HERMAN G. KLEIN AND FRANK J. BARTLETTA, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS COMMISSIONERS OF THE HUDSON COUNTY BOULEVARD COMMISSION, AND THE HUDSON COUNTY BOULEVARD COMMISSION, DEFENDANTS - APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 6, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Daniel F. Gilmore, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for appellants (Mr. William F. Kelly, County Counsel, attorney).

Mr. Burtis W. Horner argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Kenneth F. Yates, on the brief; Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

The trial court (1) adjudged unconstitutional the statute which created the Hudson County Boulevard Commission (herein Commission), (2) restrained the Commission and all its personnel from carrying out any of its statutory functions, and (3) enjoined, beginning two weeks after the date of judgment, the acceptance or disbursement of funds. The judgment was entered on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases