1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 285 F.Supp.
  5. 285 F.Supp. 219 (1967)
 

GRINNELL CORPORATION v. AMERICAN MONORAIL COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 4216.

285 F.Supp. 219 (1967)

GRINNELL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The AMERICAN MONORAIL COMPANY, and American Monorail Company, Defendants.

United States District Court D. South Carolina, Greenville Division.

Heard April 25, 1967.

Decided August 23, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Thomas Wyche, of Wyche, Burgess, Freeman & Parham, Greenville, S. C., Henry R. Ashton, and Charles B. Smith, of Fish, Richardson & Neave, New York City, David D. McKenney and Herman Foster, Providence, R. I., for plaintiff.

Donald L. Ferguson, of Haynsworth, Perry, Bryant, Marion & Johnstone, Greenville, S. C., B. D. Watts and Thomas E. Fisher, of Watts & Fisher, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

By complaint filed November 9, 1962 plaintiff sues for infringement of Fain patent 2,981,644 which issued to it April 25, 1961 on an application filed by Mitchell S. Fain. The patent, entitled Method of Cleaning Looms, relates to a method of removing lint from a series of looms arranged in a row. The method involves the use of a high velocity stream of air which is directed down onto looms and is continuously moved through a particular path...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases