1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 273 F.Supp.
  5. 273 F.Supp. 224 (1967)
 

McFARLANE v. RESINITE CORPORATION

No. 67 C 230.

273 F.Supp. 224 (1967)

Le Roy F. McFARLANE and Coilform Company, Plaintiffs, v. RESINITE CORPORATION and Precision Paper Tube Company, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D.

May 12, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Reynolds, Winston, Strawn, Smith & Patterson, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff. William Hall, George Vande Sande, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Jerome Fallon, John Chestnut, Dawson, Tilton, Fallon, Lungmus & Alexander, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MAROVITZ, District Judge.

Defendants' Motion for Separate Trial on Count I.

This action arises out of a patent controversy between competing manufacturers of coilforms. Plaintiff McFarlane who had filed his patent application on November 13, 1961, was granted U.S. Patent No. 3,105,948, consisting of eight claims, on October 1, 1963, for a COILFORM. Plaintiff Coilform Company is owned by McFarlane and his family and manufactures...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases