1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 269 F.Supp.
  5. 269 F.Supp. 205 (1967)
 

BLAW-KNOX COMPANY v. HARTSVILLE OIL MILL

Civ. A. No. 7847.

269 F.Supp. 205 (1967)

BLAW-KNOX COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. HARTSVILLE OIL MILL, a South Carolina Corporation, and the French Oil Mill Machinery Company, Defendants.

United States District Court D. South Carolina, Florence Division.

June 8, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Roddey, of Roddey, Sumwalt & Carpenter, Rock Hill, S. C., Blenko, Hoopes, Leonard & Buell, and William Henry Venable, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Philip Wilmeth, Hartsville, S. C., Karl B. Lutz, Pittsburgh, Pa., and T. Russell Foster, Hartsville, S. C., for defendants.

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

This is a civil action for infringement of United States Patent No. 2,840,459, dated June 24, 1958 which shall be referred to as the Karnofsky patent. The Karnofsky patent was issued to the plaintiff as the assignee of George B. Karnofsky, and title has remained in the plaintiff ever since. The defendant French Oil Mill Machinery Company has counterclaimed for a declaration that the Karnofsky patent is invalid and not infringed in toto. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases