1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 264 F.Supp.
  5. 264 F.Supp. 184 (1967)
 

FRALEY v. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 66-415.

264 F.Supp. 184 (1967)

Charles M. FRALEY, Plaintiff, v. The CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

February 23, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. McLaughlin, McArdle, Harrington, Feeney & McLaughlin, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Edward V. Buckley, Mercer & Buckley, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

OPINION

DUMBAULD, District Judge.

Apart from possible repercussions upon interstate commerce,1 the same criteria apply to railroads as to other industries in determining whether their activities within a particular jurisdiction are sufficient to subject them to suit there.

If therefore the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company (hereinafter called C. & O.) were engaged in an equipment rental business, leasing locomotives...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases