1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 265 F.Supp.
  5. 265 F.Supp. 136 (1967)
 

LOPEZ v. PITCHESS

Nos. 66-59, 66-1641.

265 F.Supp. 136 (1967)

Ernest Barragan LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. Peter J. PITCHESS, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, State of California, Respondent. Willard Arthur WINHOVEN, Petitioner, v. Peter J. PITCHESS, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, State of California, Respondent.

United States District Court C. D. California.

January 20, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest B. Lopez and Willard A. Winhoven, pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of State of California, by Bradley A. Stoutt, Deputy Atty. Gen. of State of California, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS.

CRARY, District Judge.

Petitioners Lopez (66-59-EC) and Winhoven (66-1641-EC) were both found guilty of murder and attempted murder by a California court. They were tried together under the same Information.

On January 14, 1966, petitioners jointly filed a petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (66-59-Y) urging as grounds for the said Writ:

(1) That the petitioners were deprived...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases