1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 264 F.Supp.
  5. 264 F.Supp. 114 (1967)
 

COURTRIGHT v. PITTMAN

Civ. A. 66-C-47.

264 F.Supp. 114 (1967)

Hazel E. COURTRIGHT and Leslie Courtright, Plaintiffs, v. Alfred PITTMAN and the United States of America, Defendants.

United States District Court D. Colorado.

January 18, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kripke, Hoffman & Friedman, by Daniel S. Hoffman, Denver, Colo., for plaintiffs.

White & Steele, by Lowell White, Denver, Colo., for defendant Alfred Pittman.

Lawrence M. Henry, U. S. Atty., by Robert E. Long, Asst. U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for defendant United States of America.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ARRAJ, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant United States of America for summary judgment. The sole question presented by the motion is whether defendant Alfred Pittman, a serviceman in the United States Army, was acting "within the scope of his employment" at the time of his automobile collision with the plaintiff. If he is found not to have been acting within the scope of his employment, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases