1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 263 F.Supp.
  5. 263 F.Supp. 79 (1967)
 

BULLARD v. RHODES PHARMACAL CO.

No. 1394.

263 F.Supp. 79 (1967)

Mina BULLARD, Plaintiff, v. RHODES PHARMACAL CO., Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court D. Montana, Missoula Division.

January 23, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goldman & McChesney, Missoula, Mont., for plaintiff.

Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, Missoula, Mont., for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge.

The defendant corporation was served with summons and complaint in this diversity action pursuant to Rule 4(d) (7), Fed.R.Civ.P., and Rules 4D(2) (f) and 4D(6) (a) Mont.R.Civ.P.

It now contests the jurisdiction of this court on the grounds that the exercise of in personam jurisdiction over it pursuant to the Montana rules violates the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases