1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 269 F.Supp.
  5. 269 F.Supp. 22 (1967)
 

MICROTRON CORP. v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.

Civ. A. No. 1058-66.

269 F.Supp. 22 (1967)

MICROTRON CORPORATION, a North Carolina corporation, and Kem-Wove Industries, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, Plaintiffs, v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, and Union Carbide Corporation, a New York corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court D. New Jersey, Civil Division.

February 1, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McCarter & English, by Julius B. Poppinga, Newark, N.J., Covington & Burling, Washington, D. C., Robert B. Owen, Washington, D.C., of counsel, for plaintiffs.

Pitney, Hardin & Kipp, by Frank C. O'Brien, Newark, N.J., for defendant Union Carbide Corp.

Lum, Biunno & Tompkins, by William F. Tompkins, Newark, N.J., for defendant Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

COOLAHAN, District Judge:

The present matter has come before the Court on cross objections to interrogatories served pursuant to a schedule of discovery established by the Court. Plaintiff [Microtron Corporation] objects to 34 interrogatories served upon it by defendants. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing [Minnesota and Union Carbide Corporation [Carbide] object to 3 and 2 interrogatories respectively of those served upon them by plaintiff.

This is a suit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases