1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 49 N.J.
  5. 49 N.J. 210 (1967)
 

IN RE GIORDANO

49 N.J. 210 (1967)

229 A.2d 524

IN THE MATTER OF A. HENRY GIORDANO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW OF NEW JERSEY, IN THE MATTER OF JAMES F. HENNEBERRY, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW OF NEW JERSEY.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 10, 1967.

Decided April 24, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

With respect to respondent, Giordano:

Mr. Edmund J. Canzona argued the cause for the Monmouth County Ethics Committee.

Mr. George Warren argued the cause for respondent Giordano (Mr. Warren and Mr. Stephen F. Lichtenstein, attorneys).

With respect to respondent, Henneberry:

Mr. Max M. Barr argued the cause for the Monmouth County Ethics Committee (Mr. Norman Mesnikoff, on the brief).

Mr. John E. Toolan argued the cause for respondent Henneberry (Messrs. Toolan, Haney & Romond, attorneys; Mr. Toolan, of counsel).

Argued with respect to Respondent Giordano June 3, 1965.

Argued with respect to Respondent Henneberry January 10, 1967.

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

The Monmouth County Ethics Committee returned two presentments charging respondent A. Henry Giordano with unethical conduct. The proceeding against respondent James F. Henneberry, Jr. grew out of conduct coming to our attention in one of the Giordano proceedings. We directed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases