Per Curiam.
Among the questions raised in this action is whether appellant's constitutional rights were infringed by the failure of the court to appoint counsel to represent him.
So far as counsel is concerned, the court did inform appellant that it would appoint counsel, but a reading of the record shows that appellant never understood that if he was indigent the court would appoint counsel to represent him at the expense of the state. This is exemplified...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.