1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 94 N.J.
  5. 94 N.J. Super. 90 (1967)
 

FLEISHMAN v. RICHARDSON-MERRELL, INC.

94 N.J. Super. 90 (1967)

226 A.2d 843

MORTON K. FLEISHMAN AND KATHRYN FLEISHMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. RICHARDSON-MERRELL INC. AND WILLIAM S. MERRELL COMPANY, DELAWARE CORPORATIONS, DEFENDANTS, AND RALPH A. HALL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 21, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. H. Frank Pettit argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. John I. Lisowski argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne, attorneys; Mr. H. Curtis Meanor, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, KOLOVSKY and CARTON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CARTON, J.A.D.

Kathryn Fleishman contends that she suffered permanent injuries to her eyes as a result of the prolonged use of the drug Triparanol, commonly called MER/29, manufactured by the corporate defendants and prescribed by her physician, defendant Ralph A. Hall. On September 16, 1963, she and her husband filed a complaint against these defendants to recover for these alleged injuries. The defendant-doctor pleaded the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases