1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 275 F.Supp.
  5. 275 F.Supp. 955 (1967)
 

W. F. H. SCHULTZ, INC. v. GLIDDEN COMPANY

Civ. A. Nos. 10838-10840.

275 F.Supp. 955 (1967)

W. F. H. SCHULTZ, INC., Plaintiff, v. The GLIDDEN COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

July 25, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henning, Chambers & Mabry, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff.

Alston, Miller & Gaines, Atlanta, Ga., Lloyd T. Whitaker, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel, for defendant.

LEWIS R. MORGAN, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff in the above three actions has filed a motion to remand on the grounds that the proper procedural steps for removal were not followed in any of the cases, and, in addition, that one of the cases does not involve the jurisdictional amount.

The three suits were originally brought in the State Court. The defendant filed a petition for removal in this Court within the prescribed period, and a copy of the removal petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases