1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 264 F.Supp.
  5. 264 F.Supp. 897 (1967)
 

CORRIGAN DISPATCH CO. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 2899; Protest Nos. 62/3719-4058.

264 F.Supp. 897 (1967)

CORRIGAN DISPATCH CO., a/c S. Riekes and Sons et al. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court, First Division.

February 23, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stein & Shostak, Los Angeles, Cal. (Marjorie M. Shostak, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Barefoot Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Sheila N. Ziff and Alfred A. Taylor, Jr., New York City, Trial Attys.), for defendant.

Before OLIVER, WATSON and RAO, Judges.

OLIVER, Judge:

The consolidated protests in this case cover merchandise described as unfilled glass candle jars. In their imported condition, they consist of clear coneshaped containers of approximately 9 inches in length with the middle portion bulging out to a diameter of from 3 to 4 inches, narrowing at the top to an opening of about 2 inches and tapering to a point at the bottom. They were assessed with duty as blown glass household articles at the rate of 50...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases