1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 266 F.Supp.
  5. 266 F.Supp. 780 (1967)
 

PARKHURST v. KLING

Civ. A. No. 36164.

266 F.Supp. 780 (1967)

Alfred B. PARKHURST v. Vincent G. KLING.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

January 25, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, William Charles Hogg, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Thomas A. Masterson, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

OPINION

KRAFT, District Judge.

On November 22, 1965, we filed an Opinion herein, D.C., 249 F.Supp. 315, in which we held, inter alia, that when one party to a telephone conversation, himself, records a communication received from the other party, no interception occurs within the meaning of the Federal and Pennsylvania statutes. 47 U.S.C.A. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases