1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 250 F.Supp.
  5. 250 F.Supp. 738 (1966)
 

I.C.E. CORPORATION v. ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION

250 F.Supp. 738 (1966)

I.C.E. CORPORATION and Intercontinental Enterprises, Ex-Und Import GMBH, Plaintiffs, v. ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

February 9, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubbell, Cohen & Stiefel, New York City, and Jacobi, Davidson & Jacobi, by Samuel L. Davidson, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Breed, Abbott & Morgan, and Byerly, Townsend, Watson & Churchill, New York City, by Howard J. Churchill, and Carroll G. Harper, New York City, for defendants.

TYLER, District Judge.

This is an action for declaratory judgment that United States Patent No. 2,837,626 issued on June 3, 1958 ("the Buck patent") is either invalid or not infringed by the operation and production of certain welding machines made and sold by plaintiffs.1

The patent in suit relates to a method for producing spiral welded pipe or tubing. Plaintiffs have now moved for summary judgment upon the basic argument that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases