1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 261 F.Supp.
  5. 261 F.Supp. 715 (1966)
 

UNITED STATES v. ESSENTIAL CONSTRUCTION CO.

Civ. A. No. 17071.

261 F.Supp. 715 (1966)

UNITED STATES of America for the Use of RAY GAINS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ESSENTIAL CONSTRUCTION CO. and the St. Paul Insurance Companies, Defendants.

United States District Court D. Maryland.

December 22, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Michael Cramer and Sisk & Cramer, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Jerrold Morgulas, M. Carl Levine, Morgulas & Foreman, New York City, and Sidney C. Miller, Baltimore, Md., for defendants.

HARVEY, District Judge.

In this Miller Act suit, a subcontractor ("Gains") is seeking to recover from the general contractor and its surety sums allegedly due under a written agreement covering a part of the work involved in the construction of enlisted men's barracks and mess at the United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland. Essential Construction Co., Inc. ("Essential"), a New York corporation with its main office in New Jersey, was awarded the principal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases