1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 242 Or.
  5. 242 Or. 616 (1966)
 

MAULDING v. ADAMS

242 Or. 616 (1966)

410 P.2d 1023

MAULDING ET AL v. ADAMS ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 16, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest M. Jachetta, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was George L. Evans, Portland.

Donald H. Joyce, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Herman W. Winter, Heppner.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for damages for misrepresentation in the sale of a house and lot. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and the court found that the alleged misrepresentations had not been made.

Our examination of the record found evidence to support the trial court's findings. The question was one of fact.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases