1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 249 F.Supp.
  5. 249 F.Supp. 594 (1966)
 

UNITED STATES v. MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING CO.

Crim. A. No. 61-73-D.

249 F.Supp. 594 (1966)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. Illinois.

January 5, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl W. Feickert, U. S. Atty., East St. Louis, Ill., John E. Sarbaugh, Chief, Midwest Office, Antitrust Division Dept. of Justice, Chicago, Ill., for United States.

John T. Chadwell and Glenn W. McGee, Chadwell, Keck, Kayser, Ruggles & McLaren, Chicago, Ill., Robert Z. Hickman, Danville, Ill., William H. Abbott and William Hunt, Richard L. Post and John L. Connolly, St. Paul, Minn., for Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.

JUERGENS, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the propriety of accepting a plea of NOLO CONTENDERE on behalf of the defendant, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company.

The Court has never looked with favor upon such pleas. At a hearing on October 20, 1965, the government stated it did not oppose the acceptance of such a plea.

The primary question in the acceptance of a nolo contendere plea is whether or not under all the circumstances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases