1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 249 F.Supp.
  5. 249 F.Supp. 575 (1966)
 

HAIG & HAIG, LIMITED v. MARADEL PRODUCTS, INC.

249 F.Supp. 575 (1966)

HAIG & HAIG, LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. MARADEL PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

January 25, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton & Taggart, New York City, for plaintiff; Leslie D. Taggart, New York City, and Daphne Robert Leeds, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Olwine, Connelly, Chase, O'Donnell & Weyher, New York City, for defendant; John Logan O'Donnell, Donald F. Johnston, Jr., and Christopher L. Carson, New York City, of counsel.

METZNER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, alleging trade-mark infringement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127, and dilution of its respective trade-marks under the New York State Anti-dilution Statute, § 368-d General Business Law, McKinney's Consol. Laws, c. 20, moves pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 65 for a temporary injunction.

Plaintiff corporation is a distiller of a Scotch whisky known as "Pinch," which has been registered as a trade-mark...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases