1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 260 F.Supp.
  5. 260 F.Supp. 540 (1966)
 

BALLANTYNE INSTRUMENTS & ELECTRONICS, INC. v. WAGNER

Civ. A. No. 2672.

260 F.Supp. 540 (1966)

BALLANTYNE INSTRUMENTS & ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Chester WAGNER and Henny Penny Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. Ohio, W. D.

July 20, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald Rapp, Stan Freedman, Smith & Schnacke, Dayton, Ohio, Sheldon W. Witcoff, Chicago, Ill., Max Wall, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for plaintiff.

James S. Hight, Wood, Herron & Evans, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JUDGMENT

WEINMAN, Chief Judge.

This matter was originally before the Court upon plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. On February 14, 1964, 227 F.Supp. 394, the Court found that each claim of the patent in suit was anticipated by the method for frying chicken in deep fat as disclosed in the publication Quantity Cookery (Revised Edition, published by Little Brown and Company, Boston...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases