1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 243 Or.
  5. 243 Or. 521 (1966)
 

SPRINKLE v. LEMLEY

243 Or. 521 (1966)

414 P.2d 797

SPRINKLE v. LEMLEY ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed May 25, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh B. Collins, Medford, and Bruce Spaulding, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With Mr. Collins on the briefs for appellant Rutter was E.K. Oppenheimer, Portland. On the briefs for appellant Lemley were Mautz, Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey & Williamson and James F. Spiekerman, Portland.

Bernard P. Kelly, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Kelly, Grant & Cooney, Medford.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and SCHWAB, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

DENECKE, J.

When the plaintiff was three years old she suffered a comminuted fracture of her upper left leg. She was treated by the defendants. She alleges that their treatment was negligent and that she was injured thereby. The jury awarded plaintiff damages and the defendants appeal.

The plaintiff, Cherol, was injured on June twenty-eighth and brought to a hospital. The defendant Dr. Lemley was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases