1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 48 N.J.
  5. 48 N.J. Super. 25 (1966)
 

JONES v. FALCEY

48 N.J. Super. 25 (1966)

LESTER C. JONES ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ROBERT M. FALCEY, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. FRANK C. OSMERS, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS, v. ROBERT M. FALCEY, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. MURRAY S. ABOFF, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS, v. ROBERT M. FALCEY, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 23, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sidney P. McCord, Jr., argued the cause for intervenors-appellants Osmers, et al (Messrs. McCord, Farrell, Eynon and Munyon, attorneys).

Mr. S. David Levy argued the cause for intervenors-appellants Aboff, et al (Messrs. Covine and Levy, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by WEINTRAUB, C.J.

This case involves the constitutionality of the Congressional District Act (1966) (c. 156, as amended by c. 183). The prior statute had been found to be invalid in these proceedings. Jones v. Falcey, 88 N.J.Super. 273 (Ch. Div. 1965). The Legislature thereupon enacted the 1966 statute now before us. The trial court upheld it, and we certified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases