1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 244 Or.
  5. 244 Or. 488 (1966)
 

HAY v. ERWIN

244 Or. 488 (1966)

419 P.2d 32

HAY v. ERWIN, VAN VLEET

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed October 19, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene E. Feltz, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Casey, Palmer & Feltz, Portland.

William McGeorge, Portland, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant. With him on the brief were McGeorge & McLeod, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

DENECKE, J.

The defendant Erwin, an attorney, represented defendant Mrs. Van Vleet in a divorce proceeding. The husband Van Vleet was known to be a man of wealth. After divorce proceedings had been commenced, defendants entered into two fee agreements. A property settlement was reached and approved in a decree of divorce. The husband paid moneys into court pursuant to the property settlement and decree. The defendant attorney asserted an attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases