1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 257 F.Supp.
  5. 257 F.Supp. 458 (1966)
 

ZILK v. DEATON FOUNTAIN SERVICE

No. 41150.

257 F.Supp. 458 (1966)

Carl S. ZILK and Flomatic Sales Corporation, an Oregon corporation, Plaintiffs, v. DEATON FOUNTAIN SERVICE, a partnership comprised of William F. Deaton and C. J. DeCeasare, and United California Bank, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. California, S. D.

May 12, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hoppe & Mitchell, San Francisco, Cal., with Carl Hoppe and James Mitchell, San Francisco, Cal., appearing for plaintiffs.

Karl Limbach, San Francisco, Cal., with Naylor & Neal, San Francisco, Cal., appearing for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT.

WOLLENBERG, District Judge.

This patent infringement suit was tried before a jury. After the conclusion of the evidence, defendant moved pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 50(a) for a directed verdict in its favor on the ground that the patent in suit was invalid as a matter of law. Defendants' motion for directed verdict was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases