1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 218 A.2d
  5. 218 A.2d 458 (1966)
 

CITY OF WINOOSKI v. MATTE

No. 348.

218 A.2d 458 (1966)

CITY OF WINOOSKI v. Edward P. and Florence M. MATTE.

Supreme Court of Vermont. Chittenden.

On Motion for Reargument April 5, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry L. Goetz, Winooski, for the city.

Joseph E. Frank, Burlington, for defendants.

Before HOLDEN, C. J., and SHANGRAW, BARNEY and KEYSER, JJ.

BARNEY, Justice.

The City of Winooski is suing these defendants as authorized under 32 V.S.A. § 5221 and 5225, to recover real estate taxes assessed. The facts are not disputed, but the plaintiff does contend that the taxpayers have forfeited the right to contest the validity of the assessment here by failing to file any objections as 32 V.S.A. § 5291 requires. The trial court ruled against the plaintiff on this question, and went on to hear the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases