1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 261 F.Supp.
  5. 261 F.Supp. 406 (1966)
 

PARRIS v. BRUDER & SONS, INC.

Civ. A. No. 31667.

261 F.Supp. 406 (1966)

Harry PARRIS v. M. A. BRUDER & SONS, INC. v. MURPHY, INC.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

November 14, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph D. Shein, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

John J. Dautrich, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

OPINION

LUONGO, District Judge.

This matter is before me on plaintiff's motion for new trial.

Harry Parris, a professional spray painter, sued M. A. Bruder & Sons, Inc. (Bruder) seeking to recover damages for a disabling asthmatic condition allegedly contracted from exposure to fumes or vapors created in the spray application of an epoxy base surface coating product manufactured by Bruder. It is Parris' contention that the product (Ply-tile)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases