1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 383 U.S.
  5. 383 U.S. 252 (1966)
 

HICKS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 51.

383 U.S. 252 (1966)

86 S.Ct. 798

15 L.Ed.2d 744

HICKS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 28, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles W. Wolfram argued the cause for petitioner, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. With him on the briefs were Lawrence Speiser, Melvin L. Wulf and Monroe Freedman.

Hubert B. Pair argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Chester H. Gray, Milton D. Korman and Ted D. Kuemmerling.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, concurring.

Among the several reasons which support the action of the Court in dismissing the writ in this case as improvidently granted, I rest my decision to join in this disposition on the lack of a record, without which I do not believe the constitutional issues tendered can properly be decided.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting.

I.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases