1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 91 N.J.
  5. 91 N.J. Super. 540 (1966)
 

IMPERATO v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUST. OF TENAFLY

91 N.J. Super. 540 (1966)

221 A.2d 751

LOUIS GEORGE IMPERATO, JR. AND ROBERT SCHWARZ, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF TENAFLY, NEW JERSEY, GEORGE LEVITIN, ORLANDO MINETTO, JR. AND HAROLD J. ANTHONY, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF TENAFLY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 30, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Lawrence G. Goodman argued the cause for appellants George Levitin and Orlando Minetto, Jr. (Messrs. Goodman & O'Dea, attorneys).

Mr. Marvin H. Gladstone argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Walter H. Jones, attorney).

Mr. Donald W. deCordova argued the cause on behalf of defendants zoning board of adjustment and building inspector.

Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants Levitin and Minetto appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Law Division remanding to the Planning Board of the Borough of Tenafly their application for a variance to permit a redivision of their properties. Our leave to appeal was restricted to the procedural question involved.

Defendant Levitin is the owner of a lot containing approximately 65,000 square feet whose only access to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases