1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 259 F.Supp.
  5. 259 F.Supp. 330 (1966)
 

POLYCHROME CORP. v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.

No. 66 Civ. 979.

259 F.Supp. 330 (1966)

POLYCHROME CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

October 11, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, for plaintiff; Edward N. Costikyan, Thomas R. Farrell, Jr., Leonard M. Marks, New York City, of counsel.

Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City, Chadwell, Keck, Kayser, Ruggles & McLaren, Chicago, Ill., William H. Abbott, Gen. Counsel, Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co., Carpenter, Kinney & Coulter, St. Paul, Minn., for defendant; John R. Schoemer, Jr., New York City, John T. Chadwell, Glenn W. McGee, Chicago, Ill., Harold J. Kinney, St. Paul, Minn., of counsel.

WYATT, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant ("3M") to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago) for "the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice". 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

The amended complaint contains four separate claims. The first three (the "antitrust claims") charge violations of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1 and following) in that 3M has attempted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases